This method was removed with 07da9ffb4 ("Do not have
Stanza.getExtension(String, String) return a generic type"). In order
to aide migration to the newer API, this commit re-adds the method and
marks it as deprecated.
This also removes the powermock dependency. Although powermock is a
fine library, it currently prevents dropping Junit4. And since we only
use the Whitebox API of powermock, this simply replaced powermock's
Whitebox with our own.
Ensure that he returned extension element is actually of the correct
type. It should not be common, but in theory, Smack's provider
architecture would allow for different types to be returned than the
ones one may expect.
The code in the integration-test/ directories should either be
migrated to sinttest (or unit tests), or get deleted. This is a first
small step towards this goal.
Returning a generic would allow for
List<ExtensionElement> list = stanza.getExtension("foo", "bar");
to compile (Note the we are calling getExtension(), not
getExtension*s*()).
Users are encouraged to use the type safe getExtension(Class<? extends
ExtensionElement) variant instead.
Fixes SMACK-825.
This is a complete redesign of what was previously
XmppNioTcpConnection. The new architecture allows to extend an XMPP
client to server (c2s) connection with new transport bindings and
other extensions.
By not directly depending on Bouncycastle (BC), we avoid conflicts between
different bouncycastle versions. It is also part of the developers job
to take care that all required security primitives are available. If
they are provide by BC or some other security provider should not be
up to Smack to decide.
We now only add BC as test dependency to satisfy this requirement when
the unit tests are executed.
Instead of marking the handle as not running by setting the handler's
value in the map to false, we now remove simply the key if there is no
handler running. This also means we no longer need to use a weak hash
map for this.
Also reduce the size of the synchronized blocks, mainly by scheduling
the handler outside of the synchronized(threadActiveMap) block.
Make some code better readable and add some more comments. Also do
start a new handler thread if the task threw.
If we do not peek at the scheduled actions in the reactors
synchronized block, then there is a kind of lost-update problem. While
Ractor.schedule() will call wakeup() on the selector, a thread could
have already determined the value of selectWait, while being blocked
at the start of the synchronized reactor section. Once it is able to
enter the section, it will use an outdated selectWait value.
This leads to scheduled actions not being executed on time.
Thanks to Eng ChongMeng for reporting this and suggesting the fix.
