Returning a generic would allow for
List<ExtensionElement> list = stanza.getExtension("foo", "bar");
to compile (Note the we are calling getExtension(), not
getExtension*s*()).
Users are encouraged to use the type safe getExtension(Class<? extends
ExtensionElement) variant instead.
Fixes SMACK-825.
Those, relatively new, listeners guarantee that the individual
listeners are not invoked in concurrently while preserving the
order. Exactly what MultiUserChat previously did with AsyncButOrdered,
which is now no longer needed and hence can be removed.
Fix a bug in the EqualsBuilder usage in UserTuneElement. Properly
synchronize listeners using CopyOnWriteSet. Make methods and fields
static where sensible and possible. Make
disableUserTuneNotifications() public (why was it private?). And a few
other minor fixes.
This commit will enable user to communicate
information about music to which user is listening.
This feature is less of a requirement and more like fun to me.
An attempt at solving SMACK-257.
Incase you see any chances of improvement,
please let me know :)
Besides the way the transport handles the stream after SASL
<success/>, the SASL logic is independend from the underlying
transport (BOSH, TCP, …). Hence move it up into
AbstractXMPPConnection.
This also has the benefit that we can make some more methods private
or package-private.
Also introduce XmlStringBuilder.optTextChild(), which causes some
associated changes.
- Reduce the amount of types that are subtypes of NamedElement. See
javadoc of NamedElement for rationale.
- Work more with XmlEnvironment in XmlStringBuilder.
- Some minor changes to XmlStringBuilder API.
by using PubSubManager.tryToPublishAndPossibleAutoCreate().
This also swaps the parameters of the method.
Thanks to Guus der Kinderen for suggesting this.
Although it it not that unreliable, it causes false negatives once in
a while. This is because the standard Java SE API does not provide a
way to force a *full* garbage collection run, we need to resort to
unreliable hacks to trigger one.
The test itself is still useful to diagnose or refute alleged memory
leaks.
This commit also move the test from JUnit 4 to Junit 5.
