vanitasvitae/Smack
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/vanitasvitae/Smack.git synced 2024-11-22 03:52:06 +01:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

[muc] State of MUC should reflect room destruction

Browse source 
After a room is destroyed, the MultiUserChat-stored representation of the 'join' state of any occupant should be updated to reflect that the user is no longer in the room.

This fixes a problem where an occupant (that not itself triggered the destruction) appears to continue be part of a room after its destruction.

Additional integration test assertions are added to check for the invalid state fixed by this commit.

fixes SMACK-949
This commit is contained in:
Guus der Kinderen 2024-09-05 15:12:28 +02:00
parent 38c6dd21b4
commit 93efdf3eda
2 changed files with 56 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
smack-extensions/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smackx/muc/MultiUserChat.java
View file

@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ public class MultiUserChat {
for (UserStatusListener listener : userStatusListeners) {
listener.roomDestroyed(alternateMuc, destroy.getPassword(), destroy.getReason());
}
userHasLeft();
}
if (isUserStatusModification) {

58
smack-integration-test/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smackx/muc/MultiUserChatIntegrationTest.java
View file

@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
package org.jivesoftware.smackx.muc;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertFalse;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
@ -87,7 +88,7 @@ public class MultiUserChatIntegrationTest extends AbstractMultiUserChatIntegrati
/**
* Asserts that a user is notified when a room is destroyed.
* Asserts that an owner is notified of room destruction when they destroy a room.
*
* @throws TimeoutException when roomDestroyed event doesn't get fired
* @throws Exception when other errors occur
@ -95,9 +96,9 @@ public class MultiUserChatIntegrationTest extends AbstractMultiUserChatIntegrati
@SmackIntegrationTest(section = "10.9", quote =
"A room owner MUST be able to destroy a room, especially if the room is persistent... The room removes all " +
"users from the room... and destroys the room")
public void mucDestroyTest() throws TimeoutException, Exception {
public void mucDestroyOwnerTest() throws TimeoutException, Exception {
EntityBareJid mucAddress = getRandomRoom("smack-inttest-destroy");
EntityBareJid mucAddress = getRandomRoom("smack-inttest-destroy-owner");
MultiUserChat muc = mucManagerOne.getMultiUserChat(mucAddress);
createMuc(muc, Resourcepart.from("one-" + randomString));
@ -127,11 +128,62 @@ public class MultiUserChatIntegrationTest extends AbstractMultiUserChatIntegrati
}
Set<EntityBareJid> joinedRooms = mucManagerOne.getJoinedRooms();
assertFalse(muc.isJoined(), "Expected " + conOne.getUser() + " to no longer be in room " + mucAddress + " after it was destroyed, but it is still in.");
assertEquals(0, joinedRooms.size(), "Expected " + conOne.getUser() + " to no longer be in any rooms after " + mucAddress + " was destroyed. But it is still in " + joinedRooms);
assertEquals(0, muc.getOccupantsCount(), "Expected room " + mucAddress + " to no longer have any occupants after it was destroyed (but it has).");
assertNull(muc.getNickname());
}
/**
* Asserts that an occupant of a room is notified when a room is destroyed.
*
* @throws TimeoutException when roomDestroyed event doesn't get fired
* @throws Exception when other errors occur
*/
@SmackIntegrationTest(section = "10.9", quote =
"A room owner MUST be able to destroy a room, especially if the room is persistent... The room removes all " +
"users from the room... and destroys the room")
public void mucDestroyTestOccupant() throws TimeoutException, Exception {
EntityBareJid mucAddress = getRandomRoom("smack-inttest-destroy-occupant");
MultiUserChat mucAsSeenByOwner = mucManagerOne.getMultiUserChat(mucAddress);
MultiUserChat mucAsSeenByParticipant = mucManagerTwo.getMultiUserChat(mucAddress);
createMuc(mucAsSeenByOwner, Resourcepart.from("one-" + randomString));
// These would be a test implementation bug, not assertion failure.
mucAsSeenByParticipant.join(Resourcepart.from("two-" + randomString));
if (!mucManagerTwo.getJoinedRooms().contains(mucAddress)) {
tryDestroy(mucAsSeenByOwner);
throw new IllegalStateException("Expected user to have joined a room '" + mucAddress + "' (but does not appear to have done so).");
}
final SimpleResultSyncPoint mucDestroyed = new SimpleResultSyncPoint();
UserStatusListener userStatusListener = new UserStatusListener() {
@Override
public void roomDestroyed(MultiUserChat alternateMUC, String password, String reason) {
mucDestroyed.signal();
}
};
mucAsSeenByParticipant.addUserStatusListener(userStatusListener);
try {
mucAsSeenByOwner.destroy("Dummy reason", null);
assertResult(mucDestroyed, "Expected " + conTwo.getUser() + " to be notified of destruction of room " + mucAddress + " (but was not).");
} finally {
mucAsSeenByParticipant.removeUserStatusListener(userStatusListener);
}
Set<EntityBareJid> joinedRooms = mucManagerTwo.getJoinedRooms();
assertFalse(mucAsSeenByParticipant.isJoined(), "Expected " + conTwo.getUser() + " to no longer be in room " + mucAddress + " after it was destroyed, but it is still in.");
assertEquals(0, joinedRooms.size(), "Expected " + conTwo.getUser() + " to no longer be in any rooms after " + mucAddress + " was destroyed. But it is still in " + joinedRooms);
assertEquals(0, mucAsSeenByParticipant.getOccupantsCount(), "Expected room " + mucAddress + " to no longer have any occupants after it was destroyed (but it has).");
assertNull(mucAsSeenByParticipant.getNickname());
}
@SmackIntegrationTest
public void mucNameChangeTest()
throws XmppStringprepException, MucAlreadyJoinedException, MissingMucCreationAcknowledgeException,