mirror of
https://github.com/vanitasvitae/Smack.git
synced 2024-12-24 11:38:00 +01:00
[sinttest]: Fix order of arguments in assertEquals()
When using 'assertEquals', the first argument is to be the _expected_ value, the second the _actual_ value. When this is inverted, the functional test will still succeed, but any generated error message ("Expected X, got Y") will be wrong. This commit fixes the order of arguments, mostly in the sinttest module.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2cbdfa0153
commit
c67292ea86
6 changed files with 15 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ public class AdHocCommandIntegrationTest extends AbstractSmackIntegrationTest {
|
|||
SubmitForm submitForm = form.getSubmitForm();
|
||||
|
||||
XMPPErrorException exception = assertThrows(XMPPErrorException.class, () -> command.next(submitForm));
|
||||
assertEquals(exception.getStanzaError().getCondition(), StanzaError.Condition.bad_request,
|
||||
assertEquals(StanzaError.Condition.bad_request, exception.getStanzaError().getCondition(),
|
||||
"Unexpected error condition received after " + conTwo.getUser() + " supplied an invalid argument " +
|
||||
"to the command node '" + commandNode + "' of " + conOne.getUser());
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ public class MultiUserChatEntityIntegrationTest extends AbstractMultiUserChatInt
|
|||
expectedCondition = StanzaError.Condition.not_acceptable;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assertEquals(xe.getStanzaError().getCondition(), expectedCondition,
|
||||
assertEquals(expectedCondition, xe.getStanzaError().getCondition(),
|
||||
"Unexpected error condition in error returned when " + conTwo.getUser() + " was trying to discover items of " + mucAsSeenByOneUserJid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ public class MultiUserChatRolesAffiliationsPrivilegesIntegrationTest extends Abs
|
|||
XMPPException.XMPPErrorException xe = assertThrows(XMPPException.XMPPErrorException.class,
|
||||
() -> mucAsSeenByTwo.revokeVoice(nicknameOne),
|
||||
"Expected an XMPP error when " + conTwo.getUser() + " was trying to revoke the 'voice' privilege of " + conOne.getUser() + " in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(xe.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "not-allowed", "Unexpected stanza error condition in error returned when " + conTwo.getUser() + " was trying to revoke the 'voice' privilege of " + conOne.getUser() + " in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals("not-allowed", xe.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "Unexpected stanza error condition in error returned when " + conTwo.getUser() + " was trying to revoke the 'voice' privilege of " + conOne.getUser() + " in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
tryDestroy(mucAsSeenByOne);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -661,9 +661,9 @@ public class MultiUserChatRolesAffiliationsPrivilegesIntegrationTest extends Abs
|
|||
XMPPException.XMPPErrorException xe3 = assertThrows(XMPPException.XMPPErrorException.class,
|
||||
() -> mucAsSeenByThree.revokeModerator(nicknameTwo),
|
||||
"Expected an XMPP error when " + conThree.getUser() + " (a moderator) was trying to revoke the 'moderator' role of " + conTwo.getUser() + " (an admin) in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(xe1.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "not-allowed", "Unexpected condition in XMPP error when " + conTwo.getUser() + " (an admin) was trying to revoke the 'moderator' role of " + conOne.getUser() + " (an owner) in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(xe2.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "not-allowed", "Unexpected condition in XMPP error when " + conThree.getUser() + " (a moderator) was trying to revoke the 'moderator' role of " + conOne.getUser() + " (an owner) in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(xe3.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "not-allowed", "Unexpected condition in XMPP error when " + conThree.getUser() + " (a moderator) was trying to revoke the 'moderator' role of " + conTwo.getUser() + " (an admin) in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals("not-allowed", xe1.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "Unexpected condition in XMPP error when " + conTwo.getUser() + " (an admin) was trying to revoke the 'moderator' role of " + conOne.getUser() + " (an owner) in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals("not-allowed", xe2.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "Unexpected condition in XMPP error when " + conThree.getUser() + " (a moderator) was trying to revoke the 'moderator' role of " + conOne.getUser() + " (an owner) in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals("not-allowed", xe3.getStanzaError().getCondition().toString(), "Unexpected condition in XMPP error when " + conThree.getUser() + " (a moderator) was trying to revoke the 'moderator' role of " + conTwo.getUser() + " (an admin) in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
tryDestroy(mucAsSeenByOne);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ public class MultiUserChatRolesAffiliationsPrivilegesIntegrationTest extends Abs
|
|||
mucAsSeenByOne.grantAdmin(conTwo.getUser().asBareJid());
|
||||
resultSyncPoint.waitForResult(timeout);
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupantsCount(), 3, "Unexpected occupant count in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(3, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupantsCount(), "Unexpected occupant count in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(MUCRole.moderator, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupant(JidCreate.entityFullFrom(mucAddress, nicknameOne)).getRole(),
|
||||
"Unexpected role for occupant " + nicknameOne + " of " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(MUCRole.moderator, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupant(JidCreate.entityFullFrom(mucAddress, nicknameTwo)).getRole(),
|
||||
|
@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ public class MultiUserChatRolesAffiliationsPrivilegesIntegrationTest extends Abs
|
|||
mucAsSeenByOne.grantAdmin(conTwo.getUser().asBareJid());
|
||||
resultSyncPoint.waitForResult(timeout);
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupantsCount(), 3, "Unexpected occupant count in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(3, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupantsCount(), "Unexpected occupant count in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(MUCRole.moderator, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupant(JidCreate.entityFullFrom(mucAddress, nicknameOne)).getRole(),
|
||||
"Unexpected role for occupant " + nicknameOne + " of " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(MUCRole.moderator, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupant(JidCreate.entityFullFrom(mucAddress, nicknameTwo)).getRole(),
|
||||
|
@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ public class MultiUserChatRolesAffiliationsPrivilegesIntegrationTest extends Abs
|
|||
mucAsSeenByThree.join(nicknameThree);
|
||||
mucAsSeenByOne.grantAdmin(conTwo.getUser().asBareJid());
|
||||
adminResultSyncPoint.waitForResult(timeout);
|
||||
assertEquals(mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupantsCount(), 3, "Unexpected occupant count in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(3, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupantsCount(), "Unexpected occupant count in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(MUCRole.moderator, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupant(jidOne).getRole(), "Unexpected role for occupant " + jidOne + " in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(MUCRole.moderator, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupant(jidTwo).getRole(), "Unexpected role for occupant " + jidTwo + " in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
assertEquals(MUCRole.participant, mucAsSeenByOne.getOccupant(jidThree).getRole(), "Unexpected role for occupant " + jidThree + " in room " + mucAddress);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -148,8 +148,9 @@ public class FormTest extends AbstractSmackIntegrationTest {
|
|||
assertNotNull(completedForm2.getField("name"));
|
||||
assertNotNull(completedForm2.getField("description"));
|
||||
assertEquals(
|
||||
completedForm2.getField("name").getValues().get(0).toString(),
|
||||
"Credit card number invalid");
|
||||
"Credit card number invalid",
|
||||
completedForm2.getField("name").getValues().get(0).toString()
|
||||
);
|
||||
assertNotNull(completedForm2.getField("time"));
|
||||
assertNotNull(completedForm2.getField("age"));
|
||||
assertEquals("20", completedForm2.getField("age").getValues().get(0).toString(), "The age is bad");
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ public class STUNResolverTest extends SmackTestCase {
|
|||
stunResolver.addCandidate(cand3);
|
||||
stunResolver.addCandidate(cand4);
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(stunResolver.getPreferredCandidate(), candH);
|
||||
assertEquals(candH, stunResolver.getPreferredCandidate());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ public class STUNResolverTest extends SmackTestCase {
|
|||
iceResolver.addCandidate(cand3);
|
||||
iceResolver.addCandidate(cand4);
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(iceResolver.getPreferredCandidate(), candH);
|
||||
assertEquals(candH, iceResolver.getPreferredCandidate());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ public class TransportCandidateTest extends SmackTestCase {
|
|||
candList.add(cand4);
|
||||
|
||||
Collections.sort(candList);
|
||||
assertEquals(candList.get(candList.size() - 1), candH);
|
||||
assertEquals(candH, candList.get(candList.size() - 1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected int getMaxConnections() {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue