The default local address is often just "the first address found in the list of addresses read from the OS" and this might mean an internal IP address that cannot reach external servers. So wherever possible use the same IP address being used to connect to the XMPP server because this local address has a better chance of being suitable.
This MR adds the above behaviour, and two UTs to test that we use the local XMPP connection IP when connected, and the previous behaviour when not.
Smack would previous run into "assert smResumptionFailed != null;" at
line 407, since if a connection exception was encountered,
waitForConditionOrConnectionException() would return, but we afterards
just assumed that either SM resumption was successful or not.
If we do not ignore the exception, then users may receive an exception
via connectionClosedOnError() on connection termination. Those
exceptions are typically unwanted if they are caused e.g. because the
server does not send a closing stream tag.
We previously ignored exceptions in this case already, but that
behavior was changed with [1: 57961a8cc1]. This commit re-adds the
behavior.
1: 57961a8cc1
Remove SynchronizationPoint
This also lifts a bunch of logic from smack-websocket-okhttp into
smack-websocket. Furthermore, the following subprojects require now
Java 11:
- smack-integration-test
- smack-omemo-signal-integration-test
- smack-repl
- smack-websocket-java11
Related tracking issue: SMACK-835
This also resulted in a refactoring of the Providers and parsing
Exceptions. NumberFormatException and ParseException can now be thrown
directly, the wrapping in a SmackParsingException is down at a higher
layer, i.e. in AbstractProvider.
The method lookupHostAddress() returns null in case of an error, hence
we need to test if the returned value is null prior adding the endpoint.
Should fix the following NPE:
java.lang.NullPointerException:
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection.connectUsingConfiguration (XMPPTCPConnection.java:606)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection.connectInternal (XMPPTCPConnection.java:846)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.AbstractXMPPConnection.connect (AbstractXMPPConnection.java:530)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.ReconnectionManager$2.run (ReconnectionManager.java:282)
at java.lang.Thread.run (Thread.java:784)
Reported-by: Eng ChongMeng <cmeng.gm@gmail.com>
Do net put an ack to the queue if it has already been shutdown. Some
servers, like ejabberd, like to request an ack even after we have send
a stream close (and hance the queue was shutdown). If we would not
check here, then the ack would dangle around in the queue, and be send
on the next re-connection attempt even before the stream open.
See the following trace of the MUC bookmarks integration test. The
fact that it is a MUC test does not matter, but this test does
disconnect the connection and reconnect it. Not how the server,
ejabberd in this case, requests an SM ack by sending an <r/> even
though we already send the </stream:stream>:
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<iq id='MD4UC-61' type='set'>
<query xmlns='jabber:iq:private'>
<storage xmlns='storage:bookmarks'>
<conference name='Smack Inttest: 7in7j' autojoin='true' jid='y9jcn5@conference.salem.geekplace.eu'>
<nick>
Nick-P2VXD7
</nick>
</conference>
</storage>
</query>
</iq>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<r xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3'/>
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<a xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3' h='29'/>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<message to='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' from='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' type='headline'>
<event xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event'>
<items node='storage:bookmarks'>
<item id='current'>
<storage xmlns='storage:bookmarks'>
<conference name='Smack Inttest: 7in7j' autojoin='true' jid='y9jcn5@conference.salem.geekplace.eu'>
<nick>
Nick-P2VXD7
</nick>
</conference>
</storage>
</item>
</items>
</event>
<addresses xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/address'>
<address jid='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090' type='replyto'/>
</addresses>
</message>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<iq xml:lang='en-US' to='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090' from='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' type='result' id='MD4UC-61'/>
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<presence id='6MS6J-20' type='unavailable'/>
<a xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3' h='31'/>
<!-- We have closed the stream -->
</stream:stream>
<!-- But the server still requests an SM ack -->
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<r xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3'/>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
</stream:stream>
22:22:05 XMPPConnection closed (XMPPTCPConnection[sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090] (4))
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<a xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3' h='31'/>
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<stream:stream xmlns='jabber:client' to='salem.geekplace.eu' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' version='1.0' from='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' xml:lang='en-US'>
22:22:05 RECV (4): ?xml version='1.0'?>
<stream:stream id='3379123514446782311' ver
22:22:05 RECV (4): sion='1.0' xml:lang='en' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' xmlns='jabber:client'>
<stream:error>
<invalid-xml xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/>
</stream:error>
</stream:stream>
22:22:05 XMPPConnection closed due to an exception (XMPPTCPConnection[sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090] (4))
org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException$StreamErrorException: invalid-xml You can read more about the meaning of this stream error at http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#streams-error-conditions
<stream:error><invalid-xml xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/></stream:error>
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.parsePackets(XMPPTCPConnection.java:981)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.access$700(XMPPTCPConnection.java:913)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader$1.run(XMPPTCPConnection.java:936)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
Instead of breaking in case the SSLEngine signals NEED_WRAP, which
leads to an endless loop while holding the
channelSelectedCallbackLock, we have to return, so that the
asynchronously invoked callback can aquire it, and do its work.
We previously only set the SM session ID to zero, but that is not
enough. On a clean shutdown, i.e. where we send a </stream> close tag,
we also have to nullify the unacknowledgedStanzas queue.
We previously only set 'connected' after connectInternal()
returned. This could lead to notifyConnectionError() ignoring stream
error exceptions, e.g. when establishing TLS which happens also in
connectInternal(), because 'connected' was still 'false'.
2020-08-06 13:08:06.265 19830-20423/org.atalk.android D/SMACK: SENT (0):
<stream:stream xmlns='jabber:client' to='atalk.sytes.net' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' version='1.0' xml:lang='en'>
2020-08-06 13:08:06.333 19830-20424/org.atalk.android D/SMACK: RECV (0): ?xml version='1.0'?>
<stream:stream id='16420577292739412012' version='1.0' xml:lang='en' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' from='atalk.sytes.net' xmlns='jabber:client'>
<stream:error>
<policy-violation xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/>
<text xml:lang='en' xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'>
Too many (20) failed authentications from this IP address (::ffff:42.60.7.13). The address will be unblocked at 05:15:34 06.08.2020 UTC
</text>
</stream:error>
</stream:stream>
2020-08-06 13:08:06.346 19830-20424/org.atalk.android I/aTalk: [241896] org.jivesoftware.smack.AbstractXMPPConnection.notifyConnectionError() Connection was already disconnected when attempting to handle org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException$StreamErrorException: policy-violation You can read more about the meaning of this stream error at http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#streams-error-conditions
<stream:error><policy-violation xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/><text xml:lang='en'>Too many (20) failed authentications from this IP address (::ffff:42.60.7.13). The address will be unblocked at 05:15:34 06.08.2020 UTC</text></stream:error>
org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException$StreamErrorException: policy-violation You can read more about the meaning of this stream error at http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#streams-error-conditions
<stream:error><policy-violation xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/><text xml:lang='en'>Too many (20) failed authentications from this IP address (::ffff:42.60.7.13). The address will be unblocked at 05:15:34 06.08.2020 UTC</text></stream:error>
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.parsePackets(XMPPTCPConnection.java:966)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.access$700(XMPPTCPConnection.java:898)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader$1.run(XMPPTCPConnection.java:921)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:919)
Which eventually leads to a NoResponseException
org.jivesoftware.smack.SmackException$NoResponseException: No response
received within reply timeout. Timeout was 30000ms (~30s). While
waiting for establishing TLS
[XMPPTCPConnection[not-authenticated] (4)]
We now set 'connected' to 'true' as soon as the transport (e.g. TCP,
BOSH, …) is connected. While this is in other ways also sensible, it
also allows notifyConnectionError() to handle exceptions in the early
connection stage.
Thanks to Eng Chong Meng for reporting this.
The current code would work just fine for a connection having
multiple endpoints. However, when there is only one endpoint
ConnectionAttemptState.nextAddress() would return null, since
connectionEndpointIterator has already iterated over the only
possible value in the contructor leading to a NullPointerException.
This means that during establishment of a connection having multiple
endpoints, the first value inside connectionEndpointIterator would
always be overlooked.
To ensure the thread starting the reader/writer threads sees them
running and eventually waits until the 'running' boolean is reset to
'false' upon connection termination.
Since the current variant of notifyConnectionError() does not execute
most of its work in a new thread, especially since instantShutdown()
is called in the invoking thread, we have to mark the connections
reader or writer threads as no longer running prior them invoking
notifyConnectionError(). Otherwise they will end up waiting for
themselves to terminate.
To make it clear that this will either return if the condition is
true *or* if a connection exception happened.
Also introduce waitFor(), which is deliberately not named
waitForCondition() because it carries a different semantic.
Martin Fidczuk
Guus der Kinderen
Florian Schmaus
Aditya Borikar