Previously publish() was "asynchronously" in that sense that the response
of the IQ as *not* awaited, and send() would wait for the
responses. It makes no sense to have that functionality this way.
Instead we now make publish() to the right thing, i.e., wait for an IQ
result, make send() a proxy for publish(), and mark send() deprecated.
In the future, there may be a publishAsync() method which returns a
Future instance.
This caused the WaitForClosingStreamElementTest integration test to
fail, because the last presences stanzas, which are send after done()
in the writer thread would return true, are not added to the
unacknowledgedStanzas queue.
The result was:
SEVERE: WaitForClosingStreamElementTest.waitForClosingStreamElementTest (LowLevel): Failed
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.SmackIntegrationTestFramework.invokeLowLevel(SmackIntegrationTestFramework.java:466)
at org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.SmackIntegrationTestFramework.runTests(SmackIntegrationTestFramework.java:375)
at org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.SmackIntegrationTestFramework.run(SmackIntegrationTestFramework.java:165)
at org.igniterealtime.smack.inttest.SmackIntegrationTestFramework.main(SmackIntegrationTestFramework.java:84)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: Sync poing yielded failure exception
at org.jivesoftware.smack.WaitForClosingStreamElementTest.waitForClosingStreamElementTest(WaitForClosingStreamElementTest.java:46)
... 8 more
Caused by: org.jivesoftware.smack.sm.StreamManagementException$StreamManagementCounterError: There was an error regarding the Stream Mangement counters. Server reported 3 handled stanzas, which means that the 3 recently send stanzas by client are now acked by the server. But Smack had only 1 to acknowledge. The stanza id of the last acked outstanding stanza is FqL1X-144
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection.processHandledCount(XMPPTCPConnection.java:1847)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection.access$2600(XMPPTCPConnection.java:149)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.parsePackets(XMPPTCPConnection.java:1176)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.access$300(XMPPTCPConnection.java:980)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader$1.run(XMPPTCPConnection.java:996)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
by extending Manager.
Because FileTransferNegotiator will hold a strong reference to the
StreamNegotiators, which will eventually prevent XMPPConnection from
being GC'ed if no weak references in StreamNegotiator are used.
Thanks to Werner Glanzer for pointing this out.
Daniele Ricci reporting the following NPE using Smack 4.1.9
java.lang.NullPointerException: Attempt to invoke virtual method 'int java.lang.String.indexOf(int)' on a null object reference
at org.jxmpp.util.XmppStringUtils.parseBareJid(XmppStringUtils.java:124)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.roster.Roster$RosterPushListener.handleIQRequest(Roster.java:1416)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.AbstractXMPPConnection$2.run(AbstractXMPPConnection.java:1061)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1113)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:588)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:818)
This is possibly caused by a service sending roster pushes for unbound
connections, i.e. where getUsers() returns 'null'. We now log such
situations instead throwing an NPE.
To prevent
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.HashMap$HashIterator.nextEntry(HashMap.java:788)
at java.util.HashMap$KeyIterator.next(HashMap.java:815)
at org.jivesoftware.smackx.ping.PingManager.pingMyServer(PingManager.java:252)
at org.kontalk.service.msgcenter.MessageCenterService$3.run(MessageCenterService.java:1114)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:818)
Thanks to Daniele Ricci for reporting this.
