Connections like XMPPTCPConnection may still reported connected, if
they are, for example disconnected but resumable. This is already
accounted for in throwAlreadyConnectedExceptionIfAppropriate(), hence
the assert is unnecessary and leads to false negatives for
XMPPTCPConnection.
For the sake of completeness, the right condition, assuming
XMPPTCPConnection is used, for the assert would be:
assert !connected || disconnectedButResumable;
This allows to avoid redundant XML namespaces within IQs, like for
example here:
<iq xmlns='jabber:client' id='EKP8I-1' type='set'>
<jingle xmlns='urn:xmpp:jingle:1' action='content-accept' sid='MySession'>
<content xmlns='urn:xmpp:jingle:1' creator='initiator' name='Hello world'>
</content>
</jingle>
</iq>
Fixes SMACK-917
Reported-by: Jonathan Lennox
This also fixes a errornous merge where the same branch with different
commit was merged into master and 4.4
The conflicting commits are
4.4:
8f760eaeb3 getRawValueCharSequences
e626580f68
master:
b47225c2c1 getRawValues
097d245358
If the successor's module is disabled then the vertex may be null. In
this case, we can simple continue with the next successor in the list.
Previously, due to d33a5a23c3 ("[core] Introduce
Builder.failOnUnknownStates() and unit tests") this would trigger an
assert in addOutgoingEdge().
Fixes: d33a5a23c3 ("[core] Introduce Builder.failOnUnknownStates() and unit tests")
The previous approach of emitting a severe log message when a
state (descriptor) was unknown was misleading. There are valid cases
where some states are not known, if, for example, a module was
explicitly disabled.
Using Builder.failOnUnknownStates() in unit tests is far cleaner, as
the existence of unknown states is tested in a controlled environment:
one where are states are supposed to be known.
ExtensionElement is now a marker interface that requires all
implementation non-abstract classes to carry a static final QNAME
field (of type QName). This is verified by a new unit test.
Also FullyQualifiedElement is renamed to simply XmlElement. XmlElement
is used over ExtensionElement when implementing classes do not
statically know the qualified name of the XML elements they
represent. In general, XmlElement should be used sparingly, and every
XML element should be modeled by its own Java class (implementing
ExtensionElement).
Properly reply to IQ requests with feature-not-implemented or
service-unavailable. In case there is no IQ request handler but the IQ
namespace is known, we reply with feature-not-implemented, otherwise
with service-unavailable.
Appearently simply calling ClassLoader.getSystemResourceAsStream()
works on Java SE but not on Android. But our FileUtils are able to
load the resource stream on Android.
This also lifts a bunch of logic from smack-websocket-okhttp into
smack-websocket. Furthermore, the following subprojects require now
Java 11:
- smack-integration-test
- smack-omemo-signal-integration-test
- smack-repl
- smack-websocket-java11
Related tracking issue: SMACK-835
This also resulted in a refactoring of the Providers and parsing
Exceptions. NumberFormatException and ParseException can now be thrown
directly, the wrapping in a SmackParsingException is down at a higher
layer, i.e. in AbstractProvider.
Assume the element
<foo:bar xmlns='namespace' xmlns:foo='foo-namespace'/>
then the <bar/> element's namespace is 'foo-namespace', but the
default namespace is 'namespace'. And this is the namespace that
scopes into inner elements.
aTalk shows the following exception:
2020-12-14 12:11:13.704 7370-30976/org.atalk.android E/AndroidRuntime: FATAL EXCEPTION: AccountManager.loadStoredAccounts
Process: org.atalk.android, PID: 7370
java.lang.AssertionError: Element type 'EE' is neither of type Class or ParameterizedType
at org.jivesoftware.smack.provider.AbstractProvider.<init>(AbstractProvider.java:46)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.provider.Provider.<init>(Provider.java:40)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.provider.ExtensionElementProvider.<init>(ExtensionElementProvider.java:29)
at org.xmpp.extensions.DefaultExtensionElementProvider.<init>(DefaultExtensionElementProvider.java:43)
at org.xmpp.extensions.coin.CoinIQProvider.<init>(CoinIQProvider.java:46)
at net.java.sip.communicator.impl.protocol.jabber.ProtocolProviderServiceJabberImpl.initialize(ProtocolProviderServiceJabberImpl.java:2091)
at net.java.sip.communicator.impl.protocol.jabber.ProtocolProviderFactoryJabberImpl.createService(ProtocolProviderFactoryJabberImpl.java:121)
at net.java.sip.communicator.service.protocol.ProtocolProviderFactory.loadAccount(ProtocolProviderFactory.java:934)
at net.java.sip.communicator.service.protocol.AccountManager.doLoadStoredAccounts(AccountManager.java:139)
at net.java.sip.communicator.service.protocol.AccountManager.loadStoredAccounts(AccountManager.java:294)
at net.java.sip.communicator.service.protocol.AccountManager.runInLoadStoredAccountsThread(AccountManager.java:394)
at net.java.sip.communicator.service.protocol.AccountManager.access$000(AccountManager.java:36)
at
net.java.sip.communicator.service.protocol.AccountManager$1.run(AccountManager.java:329)
where CoinIQProvider line 46-47 [1] reads
private final DefaultExtensionElementProvider<URIsExtension> urisProvider
= new
DefaultExtensionElementProvider<>(URIsExtension.class);
This fixes SMACK-898.
1: f61f264312/aTalk/src/main/java/org/xmpp/extensions/coin/CoinIQProvider.java (L47)
