This is actually only part one, i.e. with this commit if the user adds a
PacketExtension to an IQ it will be included in IQ.toXml(). Which was
previously only the case if the IQ subclass explicitly included packet
extensions.
The second part of the change is to change the IQ provider, so that
packet extensions are automatically parsed.
Cases where PacketExtensions are used for Message and IQ are slightly
changed. The IQ sublcass now only has a field with this
PacketExtension (see for example
bytestreams.ibb.packet.DataPacketExtension).
Also changed hoxt API: Removed unnecessary indirection and made the
API more Smack idiomatic.
this is the first stop towards fixing "SMACK-65: parsing should look for
depth", by providing the initial parsing depth to the provider. Some
methods (.e.g parseMessage) now use the depth as abort condition,
instead of a unclean String equals check.
parseIQ() and parseExtension() where both renamed to parse.
This also restricts the Exceptions thrown by the parse method, to just
XmlPullParserException, IOException and SmackException (not really a big
victory, but nevertheless a slight improvement).
StreamFeatureProvider is now gone, we simply use PacketExtensionProvider
for stream features.
by using XmlStringBuilder. Fixes SMACK-577
Also extend LazyStringBuilder with a cache. And extend XmlStringBuilder
with some more convenience methods.
Move the ELEMENT and NAMESPACE definition from Form to DataForm, where
it belongs.
that method never worked correctly since 11 years, ie. the PrivateData
was never added as element text. It's not surprisingly that this was not
discovered in more then a decade, since Smack usually never *sends*
those stanza but only receives them.
But that's no reason to not fix it. :)
instead of using the old baseName=smack appendix=project.name approach,
we are now going convention over configuration and renaming the
subprojects directories to the proper name.
Having a prefix is actually very helpful, because the resulting
libraries will be named like the subproject. And a core-4.0.0-rc1.jar is
not as explicit about what it actually *is* as a
smack-core-4.0.0-rc1.jar.
SMACK-265
