openpgp-notes/book/source/signing_data.md

<!--
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2023 The "Notes on OpenPGP" project
SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
-->

# Signatures over data

In OpenPGP, a *{term}`data signature`* guarantees the {term}`authenticity<Authentication>` and, implicitly, the integrity of certain data. Typical use cases of {term}`data signatures<Data Signature>` include the {term}`authentication` of software packages and emails.

"{term}`Authenticity<Authentication>`" in this context means that the {term}`data signature` was issued by {term}`the entity controlling the signing key material<Certificate Holder>`. However, 
it does not automatically signal if the expected party indeed controls the {term}`signer` {term}`certificate<OpenPGP Certificate>`. OpenPGP does offer mechanisms for *strong {term}`authentication`*, connecting {term}`certificates<OpenPGP Certificate>` to specific {term}`identities<Identity>`. This verifies that the intended communication partner is indeed associated with the cryptographic {term}`identity` behind the {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>`[^sign-auth].

[^sign-auth]: Other signing solutions, like [signify](https://flak.tedunangst.com/post/signify), focus on pure signing without strong {term}`authentication` of the {term}`signer`'s {term}`identity`.

{term}`Data signatures<Data Signature>` can only be issued by {term}`component keys<Component Key>` with the *{term}`signing<Signing Key Flag>`* [key flag](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#name-key-flags).

Note that {term}`data signatures<Data Signature>` are distinct from [](/signing_components), which are used to form and maintain {term}`certificates<OpenPGP Certificate>`, as well as to {term}`certify<Certification>` {term}`identities<Identity>` on {term}`certificates<OpenPGP Certificate>`.

(data-signature-types)=
## Signature types

{term}`OpenPGP data signatures<Data Signature>` use one of two [signature types](signature-types):

- [**Binary signature**](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#sigtype-binary) ({term}`type ID<Signature Type ID>` `0x00`): This is the standard {term}`signature type` for binary data and is typically used for files or data streams. {term}`Binary signatures<Binary Signature>` are calculated over the data without any modifications or transformations.
- [**Text signature**](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#name-signature-of-a-canonical-te) ({term}`type ID<Signature Type ID>` `0x01`): Used for textual data, such as email bodies. When calculating a {term}`text signature`, the data is first normalized by converting line endings into a canonical form (`<CR><LF>`). This approach mitigates issues caused by platform-specific text encodings. This is especially important for detached and {term}`cleartext signatures<Cleartext Signature>`, where the  message file might undergo re-encoding between the creation and {term}`verification` of the {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>`.

{term}`Data signatures<Data Signature>` are generated by {term}`hashing<Hash Digest>` the message content along with the {term}`metadata` in the {term}`OpenPGP signature packet`, and calculating a {term}`cryptographic signature` over that {term}`hash<Hash Digest>`. The resulting {term}`cryptographic signature` is stored in the {term}`signature packet<OpenPGP Signature Packet>`.

{term}`Data signatures<Data Signature>` manifest in three distinct forms, which will be detailed in the subsequent section.

(forms-of-data-signatures)=
## Forms of OpenPGP data signatures

{term}`OpenPGP data signatures<Data Signature>` can be applied in three distinct forms[^sign-modes-gpg]:

- **{term}`Detached<Detached Signature>`**: The OpenPGP signature exists as a separate entity, independent of the signed data.
- **{term}`Inline<Inline Signature>`**: Both the original data and its corresponding {term}`OpenPGP signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` are encapsulated within an {term}`OpenPGP message`.
- **{term}`Cleartext signature`**: A plain text message and its {term}`OpenPGP signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` coexist in a combined text format, preserving the readability of the original message.

[^sign-modes-gpg]: These three forms of {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` application align with GnuPG's `--detach-sign`, `--sign`, and `--clearsign` command options.

## Detached signatures

A {term}`detached signature` is produced by calculating an {term}`OpenPGP signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` over the data intended for signing. The original data remains unchanged, and the {term}`OpenPGP signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` is stored separately, e.g. as a standalone file. A {term}`detached signature` file can be distributed alongside or independent of the original data. The {term}`authenticity<Authentication>` and integrity of the original data file can be {term}`verified<Verification>` by using the {term}`detached signature` file.

This {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` format is especially useful for signing software releases and other files where it is imperative that the content remains unaltered during the signing process.

(inline-signature)=
## Inline signatures

An {term}`inline signature` joins the signed data and its corresponding {term}`data signature` into a single {term}`OpenPGP message`.

This method is commonly used for signing or encrypting emails. Most email software capable of handling OpenPGP communications typically uses {term}`inline signatures<Inline Signature>`.

For more details and internals, see [](adv-inline-signature).

(cleartext-signature)=
## Cleartext signatures

The *{term}`Cleartext Signature Framework`* (CSF) in OpenPGP accomplishes two primary objectives:

- maintaining the message in a human-readable cleartext format, accessible without OpenPGP-specific software
- incorporating an {term}`OpenPGP signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` for {term}`authentication` by users with OpenPGP-compatible software

### Example

The following is a detailed example of a {numref}`cleartext` signature:

```text
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

hello world
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wpgGARsKAAAAKQWCZT0vBCIhBtB7JOyRoU3SQKwtU+bIqeBUlJpBIi6nOFdu0Zyu
o9yZAAAAANqgIHAzoRTzu/7Zuxc8Izf4r3/qSCmBfDqWzTXqmVtsSBSHACka3qbN
eehqu8H6S0UK8V7yHbpVhExu9Hu72jWEzU/B0h9MR5gDhJPoWurx8YfyXBDsRS4y
r13/eqMN8kfCDw==
=Ks9w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
```

This {term}`signature<Cleartext Signature>` consists of two parts: a message ("hello world") and an ASCII-armored {term}`OpenPGP signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>`. The message is immediately comprehensible to a human reader, while the {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` block allows for the message's {term}`authenticity<Authentication>` {term}`verification` via OpenPGP software.

### Use case

{term}`Cleartext signatures<Cleartext Signature>` combine the advantages of both {term}`detached<Detached Signature>` and {term}`inline signatures<Inline Signature>`:

- **Self-contained format**: {term}`Cleartext signatures<Cleartext signature>` enable the message and its {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` to be stored as a single file. 

- **Human readability**: The message within a {term}`cleartext signature` remains accessible in a plain text format. This eliminates the need for specialized software to read the message content.

These features are particularly beneficial in scenarios where signed messages are managed semi-manually and where existing system infrastructure offers limited or no native support for OpenPGP in the workflow[^arch-certifications].

[^arch-certifications]: An illustrative example is the workflow adopted by Arch Linux to {term}`certify<Certification>` {term}`User IDs<User ID>` of new packagers. This process relies on [cleartext signed statements from existing packagers](https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archlinux-keyring/-/blob/master/.gitlab/issue_templates/New%20Packager%20Key.md?ref_type=heads&plain=1#L33-46). These signed statements are stored as attachments in an issue tracking system for later inspection. The advantage of this approach lies in the convenience of having the message and signature in a single file, which simplifies manual handling. Based on the vouches in these {term}`cleartext signed<Cleartext Signature>` messages and an [email confirmation from the new packager](https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/archlinux-keyring/-/wikis/workflows/verify-a-packager-key), the main key operators can issue {term}`OpenPGP third-party certifications<Third-party Identity Certification>`.

### Text transformations for cleartext signatures

The {term}`cleartext signature framework` includes specific text normalization procedures to ensure the integrity and clarity of the message:

- **Escaping dashes**: The framework implements a method of [dash-escaped text](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#name-dash-escaped-text) within the message. Dash-escaping ensures that the parser correctly distinguishes between the armor headers, which are part of the {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>`'s structure, and any lines in the message that happen to start with a dash.

- **Normalization of line endings**: Consistent with the approach for any other [text signature](data-signature-types), a {term}`cleartext signature` is calculated on the text with normalized line endings (`<CR><LF>`). This ensures that the {term}`signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` remains valid regardless of the text format of the receiving {term}`implementation<OpenPGP Implementation>`.

### Pitfalls

Despite their widespread adoption, {term}`cleartext signatures<Cleartext Signature>` have their limitations and are sometimes viewed as a "legacy method"[^csf-gnupg]. The {term}`RFC` details the [pitfalls of cleartext signatures](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#name-issues-with-the-cleartext-s), such as incompatibility with semantically meaningful whitespace, challenges with large messages, and security vulnerabilities related to misleading Hash header manipulations. Given these issues, safer alternatives like {term}`inline<Inline Signature>` and {term}`detached signature` forms are advised.

[^csf-gnupg]: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2023-November/035428.html