From 06c40b027561277192bb3210d2020cf71096b253 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Schaefer Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 17:48:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] i'm uncomfortable offering an explanation for this recommendation (i don't think security is a concern here. maybe interoperability?) --- book/source/08-signing_components.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/book/source/08-signing_components.md b/book/source/08-signing_components.md index 3e50354..829dfde 100644 --- a/book/source/08-signing_components.md +++ b/book/source/08-signing_components.md @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ In OpenPGP, certain subpackets are universally expected across all types of sign The key used as the issuer in the signature might be a subkey of the certificate. ``` -This subpacket can be placed in either the hashed or unhashed area due to its self-authenticating nature. However, it is recommended to include it in the signature's hashed area for enhanced security. +This subpacket can be placed in either the hashed or unhashed area due to its self-authenticating nature. However, we recommend including it in the signature's hashed area. ### Managing subpacket conflicts and duplication