mirror of
https://codeberg.org/openpgp/notes.git
synced 2024-11-25 09:02:05 +01:00
Adjust styling of "one-pass" in the nesting section
This commit is contained in:
parent
ecf0bc1c7b
commit
2444e6cc93
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -116,16 +116,16 @@ However, when a signer creates a {term}`prefixed signed message`, the signed dat
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Nesting of one-pass signatures
|
## Nesting of one-pass signatures
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Signing a message using the one-pass mechanism involves prepending a *One-Pass-Signature* (OPS) packet to the message and appending the corresponding signature, sandwiching the signed content.
|
Signing a message using the one-pass mechanism involves prepending a *one-pass signature* (OPS) packet to the message and appending the corresponding signature, sandwiching the signed content.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
An OpenPGP message can contain multiple signatures added that way.
|
An OpenPGP message can contain multiple signatures added that way.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```{note}
|
```{note}
|
||||||
One-Pass-Signatures are nested, meaning the outermost One-Pass-Signature packet corresponds to the outermost signature packet.
|
One-pass signatures are nested, meaning the outermost one-pass signature packet corresponds to the outermost signature packet.
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When a message is signed, the signature is always calculated over the contents of the literal data packet, not the literal data packet itself.
|
When a message is signed, the signature is always calculated over the contents of the literal data packet, not the literal data packet itself.
|
||||||
This means that if a message, which is compressed using a compressed data packet is wrapped using a one-pass-signature, the signature is still being calculated over the plaintext inside the literal data packet.
|
This means that if a message, which is compressed using a compressed data packet is wrapped using a one-pass signature, the signature is still being calculated over the plaintext inside the literal data packet.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There is one exception, though.
|
There is one exception, though.
|
||||||
```{note}
|
```{note}
|
||||||
|
@ -137,20 +137,20 @@ If this flag is set to `0`, it indicates that further OPSs will follow this pack
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[^nested-flag]: See [description of the nested flag](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#section-5.4-3.8.1).
|
[^nested-flag]: See [description of the nested flag](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#section-5.4-3.8.1).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This mechanism enables attested signatures, where the signer signs an already one-pass-signed message including the already contained signature.
|
This mechanism enables attested signatures, where the signer signs an already one-pass signed message including the already contained signature.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As a practical example, consider the following notation:
|
As a practical example, consider the following notation:
|
||||||
* `LIT("Hello World")` represents a literal data packet with the content `Hello World`.
|
* `LIT("Hello World")` represents a literal data packet with the content `Hello World`.
|
||||||
* `COMP(XYZ)` represents a compressed data packet over some other packet `XYZ`.
|
* `COMP(XYZ)` represents a compressed data packet over some other packet `XYZ`.
|
||||||
* `OPS₁` represents a one-pass-signature packet with the nested flag set to `1`. Analogous, `OPS₀` has the nested flag set to `0`.
|
* `OPS₁` represents a one-pass signature packet with the nested flag set to `1`. Analogous, `OPS₀` has the nested flag set to `0`.
|
||||||
* `SIG` represents a signature packet.
|
* `SIG` represents a signature packet.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A normal, one-pass-signed message looks like this:
|
A normal, one-pass signed message looks like this:
|
||||||
`OPS₁ LIT("Hello World") SIG`
|
`OPS₁ LIT("Hello World") SIG`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here, the signature is calculated over the plaintext `Hello World`, as is it in a message that has the following form: `OPS₁ COMP(LIT("Hello World")) SIG`.
|
Here, the signature is calculated over the plaintext `Hello World`, as is it in a message that has the following form: `OPS₁ COMP(LIT("Hello World")) SIG`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A message, where multiple one-pass-signatures are calculated over the same plaintext looks the following:
|
A message, where multiple one-pass signatures are calculated over the same plaintext looks the following:
|
||||||
`OPS₀ OPS₀ OPS₁ LIT("Hello World") SIG SIG SIG`
|
`OPS₀ OPS₀ OPS₁ LIT("Hello World") SIG SIG SIG`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All three signatures are calculated over the same plaintext `Hello World`.
|
All three signatures are calculated over the same plaintext `Hello World`.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue