mirror of
https://codeberg.org/openpgp/notes.git
synced 2024-11-27 01:52:06 +01:00
Revocation
This commit is contained in:
parent
23bd402f4e
commit
7bbc2f2434
1 changed files with 38 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ A revocation is used to retract the statement formed by a prior signature.
|
||||||
A subkey revocation signature revokes a prior subkey binding signature, while a certification revocation revokes a certification signature.
|
A subkey revocation signature revokes a prior subkey binding signature, while a certification revocation revokes a certification signature.
|
||||||
Typical use-cases for revocations are marking certificates or individual subkeys as unusable, or marking User IDs as no longer used.
|
Typical use-cases for revocations are marking certificates or individual subkeys as unusable, or marking User IDs as no longer used.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A revocation signature can either be hard or soft. A soft revocation of a certificate invalidates it from the revocation signature's creation time onwards, meaning signatures that were issued before the revocation remain intact, while a hard revocation invalidates the certificate retroactively, rendering all issued signatures invalid, regardless of creation time. Soft revocations are typically used whenever a key or User ID is retired or superseded gracefully, while hard revocations can for example signal compromise of secret key material.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Signature Subpackets
|
## Signature Subpackets
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A cryptographic signature alone is often not expressive enough to serve certain use-cases.
|
A cryptographic signature alone is often not expressive enough to serve certain use-cases.
|
||||||
|
@ -174,6 +176,42 @@ The signature should have the following structure:
|
||||||
Self-certifications over User IDs can optionally carry the same subpackets as listed in the previous table (key flags, features, algorithm preferences).
|
Self-certifications over User IDs can optionally carry the same subpackets as listed in the previous table (key flags, features, algorithm preferences).
|
||||||
This way, separate capabilities can be assigned to different identities.
|
This way, separate capabilities can be assigned to different identities.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Remove / Revoke User ID
|
||||||
|
Since OpenPGP certificates are often distributed by the means of key servers, new signatures on a certificate are often "merged" into existing copies of the certificate locally by the recipient.
|
||||||
|
This means, that it is not really possible to remove signatures / User IDs from a certificate, as there is no way to communicate the intention of packet deletion to the recipient.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So in order to mark a User ID as invalid, the user can publish a copy of their certificate with a `CertificationRevocation` (signature type 0x30) attached to the invalidated User ID.
|
||||||
|
This signature signals that the holder of the certificate no longer wants to be associated with that User ID.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The structure of a certification revocation is as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Subpacket | Area | Critical | Mandatory | Notes |
|
||||||
|
|-----------|------|----------|-----------|-------|
|
||||||
|
| Signature Creation Time | Hashed | True | True | Current time |
|
||||||
|
| Issuer Fingerprint | Hashed | True or false | Strongly Recommended | The primary key is the issuer |
|
||||||
|
| Reason for Revocation | Hashed | True | False | Decides over soft / hard revocation |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For User ID revocations, the value of the reason subpacket can either be `0` (no reason specified) or `32`, signaling that the User ID is no longer valid.
|
||||||
|
The latter would result in a soft revocation, while a reason code of `0` is considered a hard revocation.
|
||||||
|
Omitting the reason packet altogether is also equivalent to a hard revocation.
|
||||||
|
It is recommended to issue User ID certifications using a reason code `32` and to do certificate revocations using a direct-key signature.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### Revoke a Certificate
|
||||||
|
A user might want to revoke their whole certificate, rendering it unusable.
|
||||||
|
Depending on the circumstances, they might either want to revoke it softly, e.g. in case of migration to a new certificate, or they want to issue a hard revocation, e.g. in case of secret key material compromise. A soft-revoked certificate can be re-validated at a later point in time, by issuing a new certification, while a hard revocation is typically permanent.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The recommended way to revoke a certificate is by issuing a key revocation signature (type 0x20).
|
||||||
|
The structure of a key revocation signature is similar to that of a `CertificationRevocation` signature.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| Subpacket | Area | Critical | Mandatory | Notes |
|
||||||
|
|-----------|------|----------|-----------|-------|
|
||||||
|
| Signature Creation Time | Hashed | True | True | Current time |
|
||||||
|
| Issuer Fingerprint | Hashed | True or false | Strongly Recommended | The primary key is the issuer |
|
||||||
|
| Reason for Revocation | Hashed | True | False | Decides over soft / hard revocation |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One difference is, that the reason subpacket cannot have value `32`, but instead may be from the range of `0-3`.
|
||||||
|
Values `1` (key superseded) and `3` (key retired and no longer used) are soft reasons, while `0` (no reason) and `2` (key compromised) are considered hard.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Common Subpackets
|
#### Common Subpackets
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
There are some subpackets that are expected to be included in any type of signature.
|
There are some subpackets that are expected to be included in any type of signature.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue