Minor adjustments for #256

- small message sizes can make the overhead of large hashes particularly dramatic
- we often use "valid" to refer to the "validity of signatures", this might make the term's use potentially confusing here

book/source/about.md

@@ -23,13 +23,15 @@ With OpenPGP, you can:
 
 Three groups of people interact with OpenPGP:
 
-1. End-users, who use software that contains OpenPGP functionality (e.g., the Thunderbird email software)
+1. End users, who use software that contains OpenPGP functionality (e.g., the Thunderbird email software)
 2. Software developers who build applications that contain OpenPGP functionality
 3. Implementers of OpenPGP libraries (or other software that directly handles the processing of internal OpenPGP data structures)
 
-This document is not intended for end-users or implementers of OpenPGP libraries (or other software that directly handles internal OpenPGP data structures).
+This document is not intended for end users.
 
-Instead, this document is focused on the second group, application developers, who use OpenPGP functionality in their software projects. It describes the properties of the OpenPGP system and its uses. It presupposes solid knowledge of software development concepts and of general cryptographic concepts. Thus, this text describes OpenPGP at the "library-level," teaching concepts that will help software developers get started as a user of any implementation (e.g., [OpenPGP.js](https://openpgpjs.org/), [Sequoia-PGP](https://sequoia-pgp.org/)).
+Instead, this document is mainly aimed at the second group, application developers, who use OpenPGP functionality in their software projects. It describes the properties of the OpenPGP system and its uses. It presupposes solid knowledge of software development concepts and of general cryptographic concepts. Thus, this text describes OpenPGP at the "library-level," teaching concepts that will help software developers get started as a user of any implementation (e.g., [OpenPGP.js](https://openpgpjs.org/), [Sequoia-PGP](https://sequoia-pgp.org/)).
+
+The document may also serve as a useful supplement to the RFC for implementers of OpenPGP libraries (or other software that directly handles internal OpenPGP data structures).
 
 With the emergence of a new crop of modern, high-quality OpenPGP libraries, and the imminent release of the updated [OpenPGP version 6 specification](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh/), we think that now is a great time to implement OpenPGP functionality in applications or to modernize existing OpenPGP subsystems.
 

book/source/adv/certificates.md

@@ -224,9 +224,9 @@ Disadvantages/risks of minimizing certificates:
 - As the OpenPGP subsystem on a user's computer learns about more certificates, third-party certifications that were previously unusable may become usable. Dropping third-party certifications by unknown issuers as a part of minimization prevents this mechanism.
 - An OpenPGP implementation that minimizes a certificate might remove component keys that it cannot use itself (e.g. because it doesn't support the algorithm of that key), even if the *receiving* implementation supports them.
 - Refreshing certificates from key servers may inflate the certificate again, since OpenPGP certificates tend to act as [append-only structures](append-only).
-- Some libraries, such as [anonaddy-sequoia](https://gitlab.com/willbrowning/anonaddy-sequoia/-/blob/master/src/sequoia.rs?ref_type=heads#L125) strip unusable encryption subkeys, but retain at least one subkey, even if all subkeys are expired. Although this may leave only an expired encryption subkey in the certificate, this presents a better UX for the end-user who potentially is still in possession of the private key for decryption.
+- Some libraries, such as [anonaddy-sequoia](https://gitlab.com/willbrowning/anonaddy-sequoia/-/blob/master/src/sequoia.rs?ref_type=heads#L125) strip unusable encryption subkeys, but retain at least one subkey, even if all subkeys are expired. Although this may leave only an expired encryption subkey in the certificate, this presents a better UX for the end user who potentially is still in possession of the private key for decryption.
 
-## Guidelines
+### Guidelines
 
 1. Don't minimize certificates unless you have a good reason to.
 2. When minimizing a certificate, minimize it in a way that suites your use-case. E.g., when minimizing a certificate for distribution alongside a signed software packet, make sure to include enough historical self-signatures as to not break the verification of the signed packet.

book/source/adv/signatures.md

@@ -16,30 +16,30 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
 
 ## Choosing the hash algorithm for a signature
 
-A central element of signature packets is the hash digest of the input data. Most OpenPGP software supports a set of different hash mechanisms, of which one is chosen for each signature packet (this is one aspect of OpenPGP's *cryptographic agility*), and used to calculate the hash digest.
+A central element of signature packets is the hash digest of the input data. OpenPGP software typically supports a variety of hash mechanisms. This ability to choose from multiple options is part of what makes OpenPGP flexible in its cryptography, a feature known as *cryptographic agility*. The chosen mechanism is then used to calculate the hash digest.
 
 Different hash mechanisms offer different trade-offs:
 
-- *Hash digest size*: Larger hash size tends to correspond with greater strength against cryptanalysis, and hash digests are relatively small: at the time of this writing, typical sizes are 32 to 64 bytes. However, for some use cases - especially where small messages are sent over a bandwidth-limited transport - larger hash sizes may unacceptably increase message size.
+- *Hash digest size*: The size of the hash digest is a crucial consideration. Generally, a larger hash size is more robust against cryptanalysis. Hash digests are relatively small – typically ranging in size from 32 to 64 bytes. However, in some cases - especially where small messages are transmitted over bandwidth-limited networks - larger hash sizes may unacceptably increase message size.
-- *Computational cost*: Different hash algorithms may have different computational costs. Some OpenPGP users may prefer to limit this cost, for example on constrained computing environments.
+- *Computational cost*: Different hash algorithms have different computational costs. Where computing environments are constrained, some OpenPGP users may prefer to limit this cost.
 
-The following sections discuss how the hash algorithm is chosen, based on preferences that are associated with the involved OpenPGP certificates.
+Choosing the hash algorithm is not arbitrary but is guided by specific preferences associated with the OpenPGP certificates involved. The following sections discuss how these preferences influence which hash algorithm is chosen.
 
-### Typically: Local determination
+### General signature context, local algorithm choice
 
-Often, signature creation isn't targeted at a specific receiver. Many signatures are issued for an indeterminate set of "anyone who receives the signature."
+In many instances, the creation of a signature is not intended for a specific individual or entity. Instead, these signatures are designed to be legible for any recipient who might encounter them.
 
-For example, self-signatures that form a certificate are aimed at everyone who interacts with that certificate. Similarly, when creating a data signature for a software package, this signature is aimed at "anyone who will check the signature," often over a long period of time, easily spanning years.
+Take, for example, the self-signatures that are part of a certificate. These are intended for a wide audience — essentially, anyone who might interact with the certificate. Another example is the data signatures used for software packages. These signatures are not for a single recipient but for any user or system that verifies the signature, potentially spanning years.
 
-In such cases, the issuer of that signature chooses the hash algorithm locally, without following preferences of a third party.
+In such cases, where there isn't a specific recipient in mind, the issuer of the signature has the freedom to select the hash algorithm. This choice is made based on the issuer's own criteria or requirements, independent of any third party.
 
-### With a specific recipient: "Negotiation" based on recipient's preferences
+### Specific signature context, recipient-driven choice
 
-In contrast, when a message is created for a specific recipient, the sender can - and should - choose the hash algorithm for the signature packet [based on the recipient's hash algorithm preference](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#name-hash-algorithm-preferences).
+When a message is being prepared for a particular recipient, the selection of the hash algorithm for the signature packet should be guided by [the recipient's hash algorithm preference](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#name-hash-algorithm-preferences).
 
-The recipient's hash algorithm preference is defined in metadata of their certificate, see {ref}`preferences-features` for more details.
+The recipient's hash algorithm preference is defined in the metadata of their OpenPGP certificate. See {ref}`preferences-features` for more details.
 
-In this workflow, the signed hash digest is created with a hash algorithm that follows the recipient's preferences, and its intersection with the sender's capabilities and preferences.
+In this workflow, the signed hash digest is created with a hash algorithm representing the intersection of the recipient's preferences and the sender's capabilities and preferences.
 
 ## Signature versions
 

book/source/certificates.md

@@ -289,6 +289,6 @@ For example, Bob's OpenPGP software may issue a {term}`certification` that Bob h
 
 Take, for instance, a scenario where Bob's OpenPGP software issues a {term}`certification` confirming as legitimate the link between the {term}`User ID` `Alice Adams <alice@example.org>` and the {term}`certificate<OpenPGP Certificate>` bearing the {term}`fingerprint<OpenPGP Fingerprint>` `AAA1 8CBB 2546 85C5 8358 3205 63FD 37B6  7F33 00F9 FB0E C457 378C D29F 1026 98B3`.
 
-This process assumes that Bob knows the person known as `Alice Adams` and is confident that `alice@example.org` is indeed Alice's email address. Bob also verifies that the {term}`certificate<OpenPGP Certificate>` his OpenPGP software associates with Alice matches the one Alice uses. In essence, both users must have a {term}`certificate<OpenPGP Certificate>` for Alice with an identical {term}`fingerprint<OpenPGP Fingerprint>`. In OpenPGP version 6, manual {term}`fingerprint<OpenPGP Fingerprint>` comparison by end-users is discouraged, with a replacement {term}`verification` mechanism still under development. The {term}`verification` process must occur over a sufficiently secure channel, such as an end-to-end encrypted video call or a face-to-face meeting.
+This process assumes that Bob knows the person known as `Alice Adams` and is confident that `alice@example.org` is indeed Alice's email address. Bob also verifies that the {term}`certificate<OpenPGP Certificate>` his OpenPGP software associates with Alice matches the one Alice uses. In essence, both users must have a {term}`certificate<OpenPGP Certificate>` for Alice with an identical {term}`fingerprint<OpenPGP Fingerprint>`. In OpenPGP version 6, manual {term}`fingerprint<OpenPGP Fingerprint>` comparison by end users is discouraged, with a replacement {term}`verification` mechanism still under development. The {term}`verification` process must occur over a sufficiently secure channel, such as an end-to-end encrypted video call or a face-to-face meeting.
 
 For more on third-party {term}`certifications<Certification>`, see {ref}`third-party-certifications`.

book/source/glossary.md

@@ -292,8 +292,12 @@ Key Holder
     See {term}`Certificate Holder`.
 
 Key ID
-    The high-order (leftmost) 64 bits of an {term}`OpenPGP Fingerprint`.
+    A Key ID is a shorthand identifier for OpenPGP certificates (or for individual subkeys). A Key ID is a shortened versions of a {term}`fingerprint<OpenPGP Fingerprint>`:
-    Historically, this term refers to the low-order (rightmost) 64 bits of an {term}`OpenPGP Fingerprint`.
+    
+    - For OpenPGP v6 keys, the Key ID consists of the high-order (leftmost) 64 bits of their {term}`OpenPGP Fingerprint`.
+    - For OpenPGP v4 keys, the Key ID consists of the low-order (rightmost) 64 bits of their {term}`OpenPGP Fingerprint`.
+    
+    Note that since Key IDs are relatively short, they don't meaningfully guard against collisions. Applications must not assume that Key IDs are unique.
 
 Key Material
     May refer to {term}`Public Key Material` or {term}`Private Key Material`.

book/source/signatures.md

@@ -69,15 +69,17 @@ As outlined above, an {term}`OpenPGP signature<OpenPGP Signature Packet>` is a c
 
 ```{figure} plain_svg/OpenPGP_Signature_packet_2.svg
 :name: fig-signature-packet
-:alt: Depicts a diagram with the title "OpenPGP signature packet". A box with green dotted frame and white background provides the title "Signature", while inside the box the text reads "Signature over; Input data, Signature metadata". The words "Signature metadata" serve as title for a yellow box at the lower half of the signature type box. The yellow box also bears the green cryptographic signature symbol.
+:alt: Depicts a diagram with the title "OpenPGP signature packet." A plain white rectangle with green-dotted borders is titled "Signature." Within that rectangle are three lines of text that reads "Signature over:", "Input data", and "Signature metadata." The latter text ("Signature metadata") is the the title for a yellow tag within which there are two lines of text that read "signature type" and "additional metadata" respectively. On the top right corner of the yellow tag, the green cryptographic signature symbol ("sig") is visible.
 
 Structure and context of an {term}`OpenPGP signature packet`
 ```
 
-The input data packets differ between specific signature types. Also see {numref}`fig-signature-types`. For example:
+The input data packets differ between specific signature types. Also see {numref}`fig-signature-types`. 
 
-- for a [*binary data signature*](data-signature-types), the input data packet is a *literal data packet*, while
+For example:
-- for a [*subkey binding signature*](bind-subkey), the input data packets consist of a primary and a subkey packet.
+
+- [**Binary data signature**](data-signature-types): The input data packet is a {term}`literal data packet`.
+- [**Subkey binding signature**](bind-subkey): The input data packets consist of a primary and a subkey packet.
 
 ### Creating an OpenPGP signature packet