Do net put an ack to the queue if it has already been shutdown. Some
servers, like ejabberd, like to request an ack even after we have send
a stream close (and hance the queue was shutdown). If we would not
check here, then the ack would dangle around in the queue, and be send
on the next re-connection attempt even before the stream open.
See the following trace of the MUC bookmarks integration test. The
fact that it is a MUC test does not matter, but this test does
disconnect the connection and reconnect it. Not how the server,
ejabberd in this case, requests an SM ack by sending an <r/> even
though we already send the </stream:stream>:
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<iq id='MD4UC-61' type='set'>
<query xmlns='jabber:iq:private'>
<storage xmlns='storage:bookmarks'>
<conference name='Smack Inttest: 7in7j' autojoin='true' jid='y9jcn5@conference.salem.geekplace.eu'>
<nick>
Nick-P2VXD7
</nick>
</conference>
</storage>
</query>
</iq>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<r xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3'/>
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<a xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3' h='29'/>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<message to='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' from='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' type='headline'>
<event xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#event'>
<items node='storage:bookmarks'>
<item id='current'>
<storage xmlns='storage:bookmarks'>
<conference name='Smack Inttest: 7in7j' autojoin='true' jid='y9jcn5@conference.salem.geekplace.eu'>
<nick>
Nick-P2VXD7
</nick>
</conference>
</storage>
</item>
</items>
</event>
<addresses xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/address'>
<address jid='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090' type='replyto'/>
</addresses>
</message>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<iq xml:lang='en-US' to='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090' from='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' type='result' id='MD4UC-61'/>
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<presence id='6MS6J-20' type='unavailable'/>
<a xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3' h='31'/>
<!-- We have closed the stream -->
</stream:stream>
<!-- But the server still requests an SM ack -->
22:22:05 RECV (4):
<r xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3'/>
22:22:05 RECV (4):
</stream:stream>
22:22:05 XMPPConnection closed (XMPPTCPConnection[sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090] (4))
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<a xmlns='urn:xmpp:sm:3' h='31'/>
22:22:05 SENT (4):
<stream:stream xmlns='jabber:client' to='salem.geekplace.eu' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' version='1.0' from='sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu' xml:lang='en-US'>
22:22:05 RECV (4): ?xml version='1.0'?>
<stream:stream id='3379123514446782311' ver
22:22:05 RECV (4): sion='1.0' xml:lang='en' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' xmlns='jabber:client'>
<stream:error>
<invalid-xml xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/>
</stream:error>
</stream:stream>
22:22:05 XMPPConnection closed due to an exception (XMPPTCPConnection[sinttest-7in7j-4@salem.geekplace.eu/1415073683806426185213090] (4))
org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException$StreamErrorException: invalid-xml You can read more about the meaning of this stream error at http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#streams-error-conditions
<stream:error><invalid-xml xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/></stream:error>
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.parsePackets(XMPPTCPConnection.java:981)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.access$700(XMPPTCPConnection.java:913)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader$1.run(XMPPTCPConnection.java:936)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
Instead of breaking in case the SSLEngine signals NEED_WRAP, which
leads to an endless loop while holding the
channelSelectedCallbackLock, we have to return, so that the
asynchronously invoked callback can aquire it, and do its work.
Smack currently does unnecessary escaping of XML text, where it
escapes e.g. '"' to '"'. This bloats the stanza size, especially
if JSON payloads are involved.
Fixes SMACK-892 (although there are probably still places where
XmlStringBuilder.escape() is used when XmlStringBuild.text() could
have been used).
This means that users get now exceptions with helpful error messages
instead of the dreaded ClassCastException, like
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.jivesoftware.smack.packet.StandardExtensionElement cannot be cast to org.jivesoftware.smackx.mam.element.MamElements$MamResultExtension
at
when StanzaView.getExtension(Class) is used to retrieve the extension.
We previously only set the SM session ID to zero, but that is not
enough. On a clean shutdown, i.e. where we send a </stream> close tag,
we also have to nullify the unacknowledgedStanzas queue.
This PR aims to provide parseXrdLinkReferencesFor() method the ability
to parse forward to the first START_ELEMENT tag.The HttpLookupMethodTest
tests the HttpLookupMethod class by parsing String. This makes use of
PacketParserUtils.getParserFor(String), which already does forward
winding to reach START_ELEMENT. However when fetching endpoints from a
remote host meta data, PacketParserUtils.getParserFor(InputStream) is
used which doesn't do winding in any form. And thus, even though
HttpLookupMethodTest tests pass, this implementation would crash while
parsing remote host-meta.
We previously only set 'connected' after connectInternal()
returned. This could lead to notifyConnectionError() ignoring stream
error exceptions, e.g. when establishing TLS which happens also in
connectInternal(), because 'connected' was still 'false'.
2020-08-06 13:08:06.265 19830-20423/org.atalk.android D/SMACK: SENT (0):
<stream:stream xmlns='jabber:client' to='atalk.sytes.net' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' version='1.0' xml:lang='en'>
2020-08-06 13:08:06.333 19830-20424/org.atalk.android D/SMACK: RECV (0): ?xml version='1.0'?>
<stream:stream id='16420577292739412012' version='1.0' xml:lang='en' xmlns:stream='http://etherx.jabber.org/streams' from='atalk.sytes.net' xmlns='jabber:client'>
<stream:error>
<policy-violation xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/>
<text xml:lang='en' xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'>
Too many (20) failed authentications from this IP address (::ffff:42.60.7.13). The address will be unblocked at 05:15:34 06.08.2020 UTC
</text>
</stream:error>
</stream:stream>
2020-08-06 13:08:06.346 19830-20424/org.atalk.android I/aTalk: [241896] org.jivesoftware.smack.AbstractXMPPConnection.notifyConnectionError() Connection was already disconnected when attempting to handle org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException$StreamErrorException: policy-violation You can read more about the meaning of this stream error at http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#streams-error-conditions
<stream:error><policy-violation xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/><text xml:lang='en'>Too many (20) failed authentications from this IP address (::ffff:42.60.7.13). The address will be unblocked at 05:15:34 06.08.2020 UTC</text></stream:error>
org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPException$StreamErrorException: policy-violation You can read more about the meaning of this stream error at http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#streams-error-conditions
<stream:error><policy-violation xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:xmpp-streams'/><text xml:lang='en'>Too many (20) failed authentications from this IP address (::ffff:42.60.7.13). The address will be unblocked at 05:15:34 06.08.2020 UTC</text></stream:error>
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.parsePackets(XMPPTCPConnection.java:966)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader.access$700(XMPPTCPConnection.java:898)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.tcp.XMPPTCPConnection$PacketReader$1.run(XMPPTCPConnection.java:921)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:919)
Which eventually leads to a NoResponseException
org.jivesoftware.smack.SmackException$NoResponseException: No response
received within reply timeout. Timeout was 30000ms (~30s). While
waiting for establishing TLS
[XMPPTCPConnection[not-authenticated] (4)]
We now set 'connected' to 'true' as soon as the transport (e.g. TCP,
BOSH, …) is connected. While this is in other ways also sensible, it
also allows notifyConnectionError() to handle exceptions in the early
connection stage.
Thanks to Eng Chong Meng for reporting this.
We previously only looked in the registry for 'submit' type forms. But
also 'result' type forms may be send without field type
annotations. Same is true, but less likely, for 'form' type forms.
