mirror of
https://codeberg.org/openpgp/notes.git
synced 2024-11-15 12:52:04 +01:00
52 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
52 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
<!--
|
|
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2023 The "Notes on OpenPGP" project
|
|
SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
# Advanced material: Signatures over data
|
|
|
|
## Nesting of one-pass signatures
|
|
|
|
Signing a message using the one-pass mechanism involves prepending a *One-Pass-Signature* (OPS) packet to the message and appending the corresponding signature, sandwiching the signed content.
|
|
|
|
An OpenPGP message can contain multiple signatures added that way.
|
|
|
|
```{note}
|
|
One-Pass-Signatures are nested, meaning the outermost One-Pass-Signature packet corresponds to the outermost signature packet.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
When a message is signed, the signature is always calculated over the contents of the literal data packet, not the literal data packet itself.
|
|
This means, that if a message, which is compressed using a compressed data packet is wrapped using a one-pass-signature, the signature is still being calculated over the plaintext inside the literal data packet.
|
|
|
|
There is one exception though.
|
|
```{note}
|
|
Of course there is.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The OPS packet has a "nested" flag[^nested-flag], which can either be `1` or `0`.
|
|
If this flag is set to `0`, it indicates that further OPSs will follow this packet, which are calculated over the same plaintext data as this OPS is. A value of `1` indicates, that either no further OPS packets will follow (this OPS is the last), or that this OPS is calculated over the the usual plaintext data, but wrapped inside any OPS+Signature combinations that follow this OPS.
|
|
|
|
[^nested-flag]: See [description of the nested flag](https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-12.html#section-5.4-3.8.1).
|
|
|
|
This mechanism enables attested signatures, where the signer signs an already one-pass-signed message including the already contained signature.
|
|
|
|
As a practical example, consider the following notation:
|
|
* `LIT("Hello World")` represents a literal data packet with the content `Hello World`.
|
|
* `COMP(XYZ)` represents a compressed data packet over some other packet `XYZ`.
|
|
* `OPS₁` represents a one-pass-signature packet with the nested flag set to `1`. Analogous, `OPS₀` has the nested flag set to `0`.
|
|
* `SIG` represents a signature packet.
|
|
|
|
A normal, one-pass-signed message looks like this:
|
|
`OPS₁ LIT("Hello World") SIG`
|
|
|
|
Here, the signature is calculated over the plaintext `Hello World`, as is it in a message that has the following form: `OPS₁ COMP(LIT("Hello World")) SIG`.
|
|
|
|
A message, where multiple one-pass-signatures are calculated over the same plaintext looks the following:
|
|
`OPS₀ OPS₀ OPS₁ LIT("Hello World") SIG SIG SIG`
|
|
|
|
All three signatures are calculated over the same plaintext `Hello World`.
|
|
|
|
Now, a message, where the signer attests an already signed message has the following format:
|
|
`OPS₁ OPS₁ LIT("Hello World") SIG SIG`
|
|
|
|
While the inner signature is calculated over the usual plaintext `Hello World`, the outer signature is instead calculated over `OPS₁ Hello World SIG`.
|