When performing IBR-based account registration, we do not need to
login nor are the admin credentials typically available.
Suggested-by: Guus der Kinderen <guus@goodbytes.nl>
With 92f253cc74 ("[core] Replace
AbstractXMPPConnection.inOrderListeners") we changes the behavior of
listeners. This commit documents the expectations to the user.
Prior to this fix, Smack requires the 'open' element send on a websocket connection to be collapsed. With the change in
this commit, an expanded (eg: `<open ...></open>`) element can also be used.
fixes SMACK-935
The default local address is often just "the first address found in the list of addresses read from the OS" and this might mean an internal IP address that cannot reach external servers. So wherever possible use the same IP address being used to connect to the XMPP server because this local address has a better chance of being suitable.
This MR adds the above behaviour, and two UTs to test that we use the local XMPP connection IP when connected, and the previous behaviour when not.
Exposes a method for a MUC to invite a user to the room, and adds a listener to the MultiUserChat listener to inform users of direct invitations they have received.
Fixes SMACK-932.
Subclasses of AbstractSmackSpecificLowLevelIntegrationTest have test
methods with no parameters. This was, after the refactoring in
c5bb15c631 ("[sinttest] Add UnconnectedConnectionSource for
low-level tests") not handled properly.
Fixes: c5bb15c631 ("[sinttest] Add UnconnectedConnectionSource for low-level tests")
Also delete StanzaIdTest since the test was fundamentally weak and
flawed. It does not work anyway, since TestIQ has a fixed stanza ID.
Fixes SMACK-931.
Guus reports the following infinite recursing causing a
StackOverflowError:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.StackOverflowError
at org.jivesoftware.smack.websocket.java11.Java11WebSocket.disconnect(Java11WebSocket.java:142)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.websocket.XmppWebSocketTransportModule$XmppWebSocketTransport.disconnect(XmppWebSocketTransportModule.java:265)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection$CloseConnectionState.transitionInto(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:1086)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.attemptEnterState(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:472)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.walkStateGraphInternal(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:399)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.walkStateGraph(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:339)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.shutdown(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:551)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.instantShutdown(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:530)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.AbstractXMPPConnection.notifyConnectionError(AbstractXMPPConnection.java:1024)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.access$100(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:134)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection$1.notifyConnectionError(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:185)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.websocket.impl.AbstractWebSocket.onWebSocketFailure(AbstractWebSocket.java:128)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.websocket.java11.Java11WebSocket.onWebSocketFailure(Java11WebSocket.java:162)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.websocket.java11.Java11WebSocket.disconnect(Java11WebSocket.java:146)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.websocket.XmppWebSocketTransportModule$XmppWebSocketTransport.disconnect(XmppWebSocketTransportModule.java:265)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection$CloseConnectionState.transitionInto(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:1086)
at org.jivesoftware.smack.c2s.ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.attemptEnterState(ModularXmppClientToServerConnection.java:472)
...
This is because sendClose() in Java11WebSocket.disconnect() throws,
potentially because the output stream is already closed. We previously
would feed the exception into the onWebSocketFailure(Exception)
machinery, which would then again attempt a disconnect.
Since a failed sendClose() is nothing that needs special handling, we
simply log the exception as error. Furthermore, we only issue
sendClose() if the WebSocket's output is still open, i.e., if there is
a chance that it actually works.
Reported-by: Guus der Kinderen <guus@goodbytes.nl>
Previously low-level tests where run, potentially multiple times, with
the default connection descriptor.
Reported-by: Guus der Kinderen <guus@goodbytes.nl>
